This "bill" is surprising: if the national end of incandescent lamps, replaced by energy-saving lamps, is equivalent to "re-engineering" a Three Gorges power station; an ordinary incandescent lamp for only 2 yuan, and an energy-saving lamp is 10 times the price Above, “energy saving†encounters “no money†and directly affects the actual promotion. More than 70% of China's energy-saving lamps are exported to foreign countries, with an annual output accounting for 90% of the world's total output.
“Energy saving†and “no money saving†are contradictions. In fact, any energy saving behavior will encounter contradictions. For example, if a company wants to replace a power-saving device, it will have to invest huge sums of money at a time, and it will have to stop production and replace it. The loss in front of it can be seen, but the savings are not seen for the time being. Pros and cons, contradictions, and how to choose a value orientation? In the construction of a “resource-saving and environment-friendly†society, advocating scientific development and social harmony, it is no problem to reach a consensus on “energy saving and emission reductionâ€. The problem lies in the refinement of policies and regulations, and it must be mandatory. Standards, rather than the various units everywhere, are the right ones, which requires correct policy and regulation.
The unit is like this. When “energy saving†encounters “no moneyâ€, the family is doing its best. Energy-saving lamps "bright" into the homes of the people, experts believe that "the key is to improve the performance of the chip, while reducing the price." That's right, but it's technical. Without institutional guarantees, it is very difficult to fundamentally resolve the contradiction of "energy saving and not saving money." I believe that the energy conservation system must achieve "mandatory standards, policy compensation."
The mandatory standard is to impose mandatory requirements on the energy-saving performance of lighting fixtures and resolutely eliminate old-fashioned incandescent lamps. This year, the EU spring summit reached an agreement that the EU countries will gradually replace incandescent lamps with energy-saving lamps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; countries also intend to pass legislation to ban the production of incandescent bulbs in 2009. There is no incandescent light bulb in the whole EU, and it naturally becomes the world of energy-saving lamps. This is worth learning.
For policy compensation, it is necessary to compensate enterprises that develop low-cost, long-life energy-saving lamps, and subsidize difficult families to purchase energy-saving lamps. According to the US Energy Policy Law, if a user purchases and installs an energy-saving lamp, 75% of the cost can be borne by the government first. This is directly added to the consumption link. When energy-saving lamps are no longer "luxury goods", there will be no more "energy saving and not saving money". To resolve contradictions, technology is important, and institutions are always more important than technology. It is not enough to rely on “calling and encouragement†for “energy savingâ€. What we need most is “institutional energy conservationâ€.
1
Jingkesai Electric Co., Ltd. , http://www.hobaoelec.com